Other (80)
1841.
Other
Derecho de Sociedades y Personas Jurídicas, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, pp. 16 - 20 (2014)
1842.
Other
Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and ISDS Dispute Settlement in the TTIP, (2014)
1843.
Other
The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Treaty-based Arbitration, (2014)
1844.
Other
Review of: Handbook on the Internal Justice System at the United Nations, Max-Planck-Yearbook of United Nations Law 18, p. 746 (2014)
1845.
Other
Cartel Damage Claims, Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses and the “One-Stop Shop” Presumption: What Do Rational and Reasonable Businessmen Really Want?, (2013)
1846.
Other
Why shareholders’ Agreements are not used in U.S. listed Corporations: a conundrum in search of an explanation, (2013)
1847.
Other
Stellungnahme zum Vorschlag für eine Europäische Erbrechtsverordnung Version 2009/157 (COD) vom 16.1.2012 [PE 462.430], European Parliament. Legal and Parliamentary Affairs. Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, (2012)
1848.
Other
Private International Law in an Era of Globalisation: “Neutral” Private International Law!? An analysis through the lens of protection of weak c.q. vulnerable parties.
Newspaper Article (4)
1849.
Newspaper Article
Wie die Justiz spricht: die Kommunikation der Dritten Gewalt im digitalen Zeitalter. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (16-12-2021), p. 8 (2021)
1850.
Newspaper Article
Eine europäische Erfolgsgeschichte: Das europäische Zivilprozessrecht feiert seinen 50. Geburtstag. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: 27-09-2018, p. 6 (2018)
1851.
Newspaper Article
Die Justiz muss sich öffnen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2016-04-16), p. 6 (2016)
1852.
Newspaper Article
Mehrklassenjustiz droht: Für jeden etwas: TTIP, Schieds- und Amtsgerichte. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (299 ), p. 20 (2014)
Case Note (24)
1853.
Case Note
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Reparations Order, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, ICL 2033 (ICC 2021), 8 March 2021. International Criminal Court, March 08, 2021 - ICC-01/04-02/06-2659 (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Reparations Order, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, ICL 2033 (ICC 2021). (2021)
1854.
Case Note
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, First Decision on Reparations Process, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2547, ICL 2004 (ICC 2020), 26 June 2020. International Criminal Court, June 26, 2020 - ICC-01/04-02/06-2547 (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, First Decision on Reparations Process, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2547, ICL 2004 (ICC 2020). Oxford Reports on International Criminal Law (2021)
1855.
Case Note
Effectenbezitters: a flawed argument to limit jurisdiction under article 7(2) of Brussels I bis [Blog]. Available at: https://eapil.org/2021/07/07/effectenbezitters-a-flawed-argument-to-limit-jurisdiction-under-article-72-of-brussels-i-bis/ (2021)
1856.
Case Note
Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor v Bemba, Decision on Mr Bemba’s claim for compensation and damages, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case no ICC-01/05-01/08-3694, ICL 1996 (ICC 2020), 18 May 2020. International Criminal Court, May 18, 2021 - ICC-01/05-01/08-3694 (Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor v Bemba, Decision on Mr Bemba’s claim for compensation and damages, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case no ICC-01/05-01/08-3694, ICL 1996 (ICC 2020). Oxford Reports on International Criminal Law (2021)
1857.
Case Note
Place where the harmful event occurred and financial damage connected to breaches of obligations to disclose information by an issuer of securities: no jurisdiction if the defendant was not subject to such obligations in the State where the investment account was located?. EU Law Live (2021)
1858.
Case Note
VKI v VW and the diesel scandal: final buyers may bring tortious claims before the courts for the place where the vehicle was purchased. Court of Justice of the European Union, July 09, 2020 - C-343/19 (Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen). EU Law Live (2020)
1859.
Case Note
Headnote on Antaris GmbH and Dr Michael Göde v The Czech Republic, Award. PCA Case, 2014-01 (Antaris GmbH and Dr Michael Göde v The Czech Republic). OUP Investment Claims (2019)
1860.
Case Note
316 (7), pp. 582 - 587 (2018)
Wanneer een private rechtspersoon als overheidsorgaan kan worden aangemerkt met het oog op de rechtstreekse werking van een EU-richtlijn: de ‘Foster’-criteria verduidelijkt. Court of Justice , October 10, 2017 - EU:C:2017:745 . Rechtspraak Antwerpen Brussel Gent