Sonstige (80)

1841.
Sonstige
Oro Martinez, C.: Derecho de Sociedades y Personas Jurídicas, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, S. 16 - 20 (2014)
1842.
Sonstige
Koprivica, A.: Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and ISDS Dispute Settlement in the TTIP, (2014)
1843.
Sonstige
Koprivica, A.: The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Treaty-based Arbitration, (2014)
1844.
Sonstige
Dimitropoulos, G.: Review of: Handbook on the Internal Justice System at the United Nations, Max-Planck-Yearbook of United Nations Law 18, S. 746 (2014)
1845.
Sonstige
Pavlova, P.: Cartel Damage Claims, Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses and the “One-Stop Shop” Presumption: What Do Rational and Reasonable Businessmen Really Want?, (2013)
1846.
Sonstige
Ventoruzzo, M.: Why shareholders’ Agreements are not used in U.S. listed Corporations: a conundrum in search of an explanation, (2013)
1847.
Sonstige
Hess, B.; Jayme, E.; Pfeiffer, T.: Stellungnahme zum Vorschlag für eine Europäische Erbrechtsverordnung Version 2009/157 (COD) vom 16.1.2012 [PE 462.430], European Parliament. Legal and Parliamentary Affairs. Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, (2012)
1848.
Sonstige
Van Den Eeckhout, V.: Private International Law in an Era of Globalisation: “Neutral” Private International Law!? An analysis through the lens of protection of weak c.q. vulnerable parties.

Zeitungsartikel (4)

1849.
Zeitungsartikel
Hess, B.; Voss, W.: Wie die Justiz spricht: die Kommunikation der Dritten Gewalt im digitalen Zeitalter. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (16-12-2021), S. 8 (2021)
1850.
Zeitungsartikel
Hess, B.: Eine europäische Erfolgsgeschichte: Das europäische Zivilprozessrecht feiert seinen 50. Geburtstag. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: 27-09-2018, S. 6 (2018)
1851.
Zeitungsartikel
Hess, B.: Die Justiz muss sich öffnen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2016-04-16), S. 6 (2016)
1852.
Zeitungsartikel
Hess, B.: Mehrklassenjustiz droht: Für jeden etwas: TTIP, Schieds- und Amtsgerichte. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (299 ), S. 20 (2014)

Entscheidungsanmerkung (24)

1853.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Biazatti, B.: Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Reparations Order, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, ICL 2033 (ICC 2021), 8 March 2021. International Criminal Court, 08. März 2021 - ICC-01/04-02/06-2659 (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Reparations Order, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, ICL 2033 (ICC 2021). (2021)
1854.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Biazatti, B.: Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, First Decision on Reparations Process, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2547, ICL 2004 (ICC 2020), 26 June 2020. International Criminal Court, 26. Juni 2020 - ICC-01/04-02/06-2547 (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, First Decision on Reparations Process, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2547, ICL 2004 (ICC 2020). Oxford Reports on International Criminal Law (2021)
1855.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Vallines, E.: Effectenbezitters: a flawed argument to limit jurisdiction under article 7(2) of Brussels I bis [Blog]. Available at: https://eapil.org/2021/07/07/effectenbezitters-a-flawed-argument-to-limit-jurisdiction-under-article-72-of-brussels-i-bis/ (2021)
1856.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Biazatti, B.: Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor v Bemba, Decision on Mr Bemba’s claim for compensation and damages, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case no ICC-01/05-01/08-3694, ICL 1996 (ICC 2020), 18 May 2020. International Criminal Court, 18. Mai 2021 - ICC-01/05-01/08-3694 (Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor v Bemba, Decision on Mr Bemba’s claim for compensation and damages, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case no ICC-01/05-01/08-3694, ICL 1996 (ICC 2020). Oxford Reports on International Criminal Law (2021)
1857.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Vallines, E.: Place where the harmful event occurred and financial damage connected to breaches of obligations to disclose information by an issuer of securities: no jurisdiction if the defendant was not subject to such obligations in the State where the investment account was located?. EU Law Live (2021)
1858.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Vallines, E.: VKI v VW and the diesel scandal: final buyers may bring tortious claims before the courts for the place where the vehicle was purchased. Court of Justice of the European Union, 09. Juli 2020 - C-343/19 (Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen). EU Law Live (2020)
1859.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Cavdarevic, I.: Headnote on Antaris GmbH and Dr Michael Göde v The Czech Republic, Award. PCA Case, 2014-01 (Antaris GmbH and Dr Michael Göde v The Czech Republic). OUP Investment Claims (2019)
1860.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Nowak, J. T.: Wanneer een private rechtspersoon als overheidsorgaan kan worden aangemerkt met het oog op de rechtstreekse werking van een EU-richtlijn: de ‘Foster’-criteria verduidelijkt. Court of Justice , 10. Oktober 2017 - EU:C:2017:745 . Rechtspraak Antwerpen Brussel Gent 316 (7), S. 582 - 587 (2018)
Zur Redakteursansicht