Sonstige (80)
1841.
Sonstige
Derecho de Sociedades y Personas Jurídicas, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, S. 16 - 20 (2014)
1842.
Sonstige
Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and ISDS Dispute Settlement in the TTIP, (2014)
1843.
Sonstige
The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Treaty-based Arbitration, (2014)
1844.
Sonstige
Review of: Handbook on the Internal Justice System at the United Nations, Max-Planck-Yearbook of United Nations Law 18, S. 746 (2014)
1845.
Sonstige
Cartel Damage Claims, Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses and the “One-Stop Shop” Presumption: What Do Rational and Reasonable Businessmen Really Want?, (2013)
1846.
Sonstige
Why shareholders’ Agreements are not used in U.S. listed Corporations: a conundrum in search of an explanation, (2013)
1847.
Sonstige
Stellungnahme zum Vorschlag für eine Europäische Erbrechtsverordnung Version 2009/157 (COD) vom 16.1.2012 [PE 462.430], European Parliament. Legal and Parliamentary Affairs. Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, (2012)
1848.
Sonstige
Private International Law in an Era of Globalisation: “Neutral” Private International Law!? An analysis through the lens of protection of weak c.q. vulnerable parties.
Zeitungsartikel (4)
1849.
Zeitungsartikel
Wie die Justiz spricht: die Kommunikation der Dritten Gewalt im digitalen Zeitalter. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (16-12-2021), S. 8 (2021)
1850.
Zeitungsartikel
Eine europäische Erfolgsgeschichte: Das europäische Zivilprozessrecht feiert seinen 50. Geburtstag. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: 27-09-2018, S. 6 (2018)
1851.
Zeitungsartikel
Die Justiz muss sich öffnen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2016-04-16), S. 6 (2016)
1852.
Zeitungsartikel
Mehrklassenjustiz droht: Für jeden etwas: TTIP, Schieds- und Amtsgerichte. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (299 ), S. 20 (2014)
Entscheidungsanmerkung (24)
1853.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Reparations Order, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, ICL 2033 (ICC 2021), 8 March 2021. International Criminal Court, 08. März 2021 - ICC-01/04-02/06-2659 (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Reparations Order, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, ICL 2033 (ICC 2021). (2021)
1854.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, First Decision on Reparations Process, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2547, ICL 2004 (ICC 2020), 26 June 2020. International Criminal Court, 26. Juni 2020 - ICC-01/04-02/06-2547 (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, First Decision on Reparations Process, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2547, ICL 2004 (ICC 2020). Oxford Reports on International Criminal Law (2021)
1855.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Effectenbezitters: a flawed argument to limit jurisdiction under article 7(2) of Brussels I bis [Blog]. Available at: https://eapil.org/2021/07/07/effectenbezitters-a-flawed-argument-to-limit-jurisdiction-under-article-72-of-brussels-i-bis/ (2021)
1856.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor v Bemba, Decision on Mr Bemba’s claim for compensation and damages, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case no ICC-01/05-01/08-3694, ICL 1996 (ICC 2020), 18 May 2020. International Criminal Court, 18. Mai 2021 - ICC-01/05-01/08-3694 (Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor v Bemba, Decision on Mr Bemba’s claim for compensation and damages, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case no ICC-01/05-01/08-3694, ICL 1996 (ICC 2020). Oxford Reports on International Criminal Law (2021)
1857.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Place where the harmful event occurred and financial damage connected to breaches of obligations to disclose information by an issuer of securities: no jurisdiction if the defendant was not subject to such obligations in the State where the investment account was located?. EU Law Live (2021)
1858.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
VKI v VW and the diesel scandal: final buyers may bring tortious claims before the courts for the place where the vehicle was purchased. Court of Justice of the European Union, 09. Juli 2020 - C-343/19 (Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen). EU Law Live (2020)
1859.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
Headnote on Antaris GmbH and Dr Michael Göde v The Czech Republic, Award. PCA Case, 2014-01 (Antaris GmbH and Dr Michael Göde v The Czech Republic). OUP Investment Claims (2019)
1860.
Entscheidungsanmerkung
316 (7), S. 582 - 587 (2018)
Wanneer een private rechtspersoon als overheidsorgaan kan worden aangemerkt met het oog op de rechtstreekse werking van een EU-richtlijn: de ‘Foster’-criteria verduidelijkt. Court of Justice , 10. Oktober 2017 - EU:C:2017:745 . Rechtspraak Antwerpen Brussel Gent