Wissenschaftliche Publikationen

Zamir, E.; Engel, C.: Sunlight is the best disinfectant – or is it? Anonymity as a means to enhance impartiality. Arizona Law Review 63 (4), S. 1063 - 1087 (2021)

Crosetto, P.; Güth, W.: What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game. Journal of Economic Psychology 87, 102419 (2021)

Engel, C.: Challenges in the interdisciplinary use of comparative law. American Journal of Comparative Law 69, S. 777 - 797 (2021)

Hülsewig, O.; Steinbach, A.: Monetary financing and fiscal discipline. International Review of Law and Economics 68, 106004 (2021)

Mischkowski, D.; Glöckner, A.; Lewisch, P.: Information search, coherence effects, and their interplay in legal decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology 87, 102445 (2021)

Normann, H.-T.; Sternberg, M.: Do machines collude better than humans? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 12 (10), S. 765 - 771 (2021)

Petersen, N.; Chatziathanasiou, K.: Empirical research in comparative constitutional law: The cool kid on the block or all smoke and mirrors? International Journal of Constitutional Law 19 (5), S. 1810 - 1834 (2021)

Petersen, N.; Chatziathanasiou, K.: On the seductions of quantification: A rejoinder. International Journal of Constitutional Law 19 (5), S. 1854 - 1858 (2021)

Sendroiu, I.; Upenieks, L.; Schafer, T.: The Divergent Mental Health Effects of Dashed Expectations and Unfulfilled Aspirations: Evidence from American Lawyers’ Careers. Social Psychology Quarterly 84 (4), S. 376 - 397 (2021)

Sasse, J.; van Breen, J.; Spears, R.; Gordijn, E.: The rocky road from experience to expression of emotions: Women’s anger about sexism. Affective Science 2, S. 414 - 426 (2021)

Engel, C.: The impact of behavioral economics on the law: Introduction. Review of Law & Economics 17 (2), S. 241 - 251 (2021)

Rahal, R.-M.; Fiedler, S.: Cognitive and affective processes of prosociality. Current Opinion in Psychology (2021)

Terrier, C.; Chen, D. L.; Sutter, M.: COVID-19 within families amplifies the prosociality gap between adolescents of high and low socioeconomic status. PNAS – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (46), e2110891118 (2021)

van den Akker, O. R.; Campbell, L.; Damian, R. I.; Hall, A. N.; Kruse, E.; Ritchie, S. J.; van't Veer, A. E.; Weston, S. J.; Chopik, W. J.; Davis-Kean, P. E. et al.; Kosie, J. E.; Olsen, J.; Valentine, K. D.; Bakker, M.: Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial. Meta-Psychology 5, S. 1 - 19 (2021)

Hellwig, M. F.: "Capitalism: What has gone wrong?" Who went wrong? Capitalism? The market economy? Governments? "Neoliberal" economics? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 37 (4), S. 664 - 677 (2021)

Glätzle-Rützler, D.; Lergetporer, P.; Sutter, M.: Collective intertemporal decisions and heterogeneity in groups. Games and Economic Behavior 130, S. 131 - 147 (2021)

Kiessling, L.: How do parents perceive the returns to parenting styles and neighborhoods? European Economic Review 139, 103906 (2021)

Ehlert, A.; Böhm, R.; Fleiß, J.; Rauhut, H.; Rybnicek, R.; Winter, F.: The development of prosociality: Evidence for a negative association between age and prosocial value orientation from a representative sample in Austria. Games 12 (3), 67 (2021)

Cerrone, C.; Hermstrüwer, Y.; Robalo, P.: Debarment and collusion in procurement auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 129, S. 114 - 143 (2021)

Chatziathanasiou, K.; Hippel, S.; Kurschilgen, M.: Property, redistribution, and the status quo: A laboratory study. Experimental Economics 24, S. 919 - 951 (2021)